Cybersecurity ‘Is not Some Legacy Cold War Issue’

Christopher Painter, then-coordinator for cyber issues at the State Department, addresses the Akamai Government Forum on March 28, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Photo: David Keith for MeriTalk)

Christopher Painter made the case for cyber diplomacy after stepping down as cyber coordinator for the State Department in July.

Painter wrote a blog post saying that cyber issues continue to grow, which increases the need for global discussions on cybersecurity.

Yet Politico reported that the State Department is considering getting rid of its cybersecurity department.

“While we have accomplished much, we are still at the beginning of this journey and there is a long road ahead,” Painter said. “Indeed, I believe we are at an inflection point, where the work we do now and the choices we make will determine whether we can all continue to benefit from this amazing technology, or whether both growing policy and technical threats will undermine its incredible potential. Achieving the future we want will require continued high-level attention and a significant and sustained effort.”

Join us at the sixth annual Cyber Security Brainstorm on Sept. 20 at the Newseum to discuss the cyber strategies and opportunities that can keep our Federal government one step ahead at all times. Click here to learn more and register.

Many Federal agencies, including the State Department, the National Security Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense, all have their hands in the cyber sphere. While DHS and DoD collaborate on mitigating cyber threats, the State Department has focused its energy on communicating with other countries on norms of behavior in cyberspace.

“We made concrete progress, working with other countries and partners, to ensure we maintain an open, interoperable, reliable and secure cyberspace for the future, while responding to growing threats posed by nation-states, criminal groups, terrorists and others,” Painter said.

The State Department negotiated an agreement with China that established that no state should use cyber means to steal the intellectual property and trade secrets of another to benefit its commercial sector. This agreement has been widely adopted by other countries, according to Painter.

The State Department worked with the Department of Justice to get more countries to adopt the Budapest cyber crime convention, which increased international cooperation among law enforcement professionals. The State Department also worked with DHS to create a capacity building initiative for countries to build strategies and abilities to protect themselves against cyberattacks.

“This is not some legacy Cold War issue but the quintessential 21st century issue of our national security—involving aspects of human rights, security and economic policy—requiring high-level leadership and a matrixed 21st century response that leverages all of our capabilities,” Painter said. “I have devoted the last 26 years to these issues and I will stay passionate about them and stay involved. These issues are too important to our future for any of us to ignore.”

 

One Comment
  1. Anonymous | - Reply
    Chris Painter has it right. Cyberspace is an acknowledged domain in which our world exists. We can't touch it, hear it, see it, smell it, or taste it. Yet it is everywhere. Like any other operational domain, without rules there is no order and no security. Cybersecurity diplomacy doesn't aim to make cyberspace safe any more than traditional diplomacy prevents physical war. Diplomacy establishes the norms so aberrant behavior can be identified and countered. Without the discussion focused on cyber, burying cyber as a component of the bureaus at State will dilute and weaken the ability to act and react. If we have a bureau for European Affairs because we have interests, allies, and investment there then if follows that we need a bureau focused on cyberspace. It is a global domain without border and involves everyone. Let DHS and DoD build the walls and wield the hammer. Allow State to define the wall and shape the anvil. Cyberspace must be elevated to full bureau status and resourced to establish the international norms so that outliers can be coerced or punished as required.

Leave a Reply

Recent